The Banking and Strategy Initiative

Chillin' out till it needs to be funded

A Banking sector analyst reveals all

Wall Street Sign. Author: Ramy Majouji

Image via Wikipedia

Mike Mayo follows on to the numerous Financial crisis accounts and decides to write about the inner workings of Wall Street and why nothing would change

 

An insider points out the holes that still exist on Wall
Street and in the banking system
Exile on Wall Street is a gripping read for anyone with an interest in
business and finance, U.S. capitalism, the future of banking, and the root
causes of the financial meltdown.Award winning, veteran sell side Wall Street analyst Mike Mayo writes about
one of the biggest financial and political issues of our time – the role of
finance and banks in the US. He has worked at six Wall Street firms, analyzing
banks and protesting against bad practices for two decades.

In Exile on Wall Street,Mayo:

  • Lays out practices that have diminished capitalism and the banking
    sector
  • Shares his battle scars from calling truth to power at some of the largest
    banks in the world and how he survived challenging the status quo to be credited
    as one of the few who saw the crisis coming
  • Blows the lid off the true inner workings of the big banks and shows the
    ways in which Wall Street is just as bad today as it was pre-crash.
  • Analyzes the fallout stemming from the market crash, pointing out the
    numerous holes that still exist in the system, and offers practical
    solutions.

While it provides an education, this is no textbook. It is also an invaluable
resource for finance practitioners and citizens alike.

Ex  Lehman Veep, Barry Ritholtz, posted a review:

Exile on Wall Street: One Analyst’s Fight to Save the Big Banks from Themselves by Mike Mayo is one of the more important books to be published since the start of the financial crisis. Part memoir, part revelatory narrative of Mike’s career, this highly personal but informative book provides some very important information about how Wall Street works – or doesn’t – and confirms the view of many people than most deals are bad deals, done only to enrich the parties but not investors.

Mayo provides a lot of important detail about how the major Wall Street firms operate and, in particular, why the larger banks and their clients are more concerned about making money than creating value.  Mike learned as did I that truth is not beauty on Wall Street, except in those few, generally smaller firms that have been able to preserve a culture of client service and quality.  As Mike points out several times in Exile, many large cap mergers are done simply to cash out the managers.

“Two things are worth noting about these super-size banks,” Mayo writes.  “First, much of their growth has come from mergers and acquisitions.  They are not growing like Google, by creating a product and doing it better than anyone else.  Instead they are just buying out their competitors… Secondly, many of these banks would likely not have grown to their current size without federal assistance in the past.  In all the bank crises of previous decades, bank failures were thought to be too economically disruptive.  But government bailouts – including the most recent round – didn’t resolve that problem. They merely delayed it, allowing banks to keep growing in size and scope, making the potential cataclysm next time that much bigger.”

This quote hints at one of my criticisms of Exile on Wall Street, namely that Mike does not yet appreciate that nobody in Washington or on Wall Street wants banks, especially the largest banks, to behave.  There are many places in the book where I expected Mike to turn that corner of epiphany and state this case, but let me do it for him.

Whether you talk of the National Bank Act of 1865, the creation of the Fed in 1913 or the subsequent birthing of the housing GSEs in the 1930s, both the business community and their lackeys in Washington were more concerned about stoking employment and sales today than in safety and soundness of money or banks.  I touched on this point in my 2010 book, Inflated: How Money and Debt Built the American Dream, which begins with this quote from Hayek’s “Denationalization of Money” essay:

“I do not think it is an exaggeration to say that it is wholly impossible for a central bank subject to political control, or even exposed to serious political pressure, to regulate the quantity of money in a way conducive to a smoothly functioning market order. A good money, like good law, must operate without regard to the effect that decisions of the issuer will have on known groups or individuals. A benevolent dictator might conceivably disregard these effects; no democratic government dependent on a number of special interests can possibly do so.”

Enhanced by Zemanta

Information

This entry was posted on December 9, 2011 by in Financial Markets and tagged , , , , , , , .

Archives

%d bloggers like this: